In telling Noah how to escape the world-wide
flood–the means that God had chosen to blot out life from the earth–God said, “But
I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall come into the ark, you,
your sons, your wife, and your sons' wives with you” (Gen 6:18). This is the
first time the word “covenant” actually appears in the biblical text. Note,
however, the phrase “establish my covenant;” this phrase is different than “cut
a covenant,” which is used of the Abrahamic Covenant in Genesis 15:18. “Cut a
covenant” refers to the initiation of a covenant, whereas “establish a
covenant” refers to the renewal of a previous covenant arrangement.
The Noahic Covenant was a renewal of the Creation Covenant aspects of the
Adamic Covenant.
The
terms in which God established the Noahic Covenant were reflective of God’s
original act of creation. When it was first made, the earth was formless and
void: covered with water (Gen1:2). God made light and darkness–naming the day and
night–then He made the sun, moon, and stars to govern the day and night, as
well as the seasons, days and years. Following the flood in Noah’s day–in which
the earth was returned to a watery, formless state, God re-established seedtime
and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night (Gen 8:22).
When
God made human beings, He directed them to be fruitful and multiply (Gen 1:28),
and He gave them instructions concerning the food that they were to eat (Gen
1:29). Likewise, in the context of the Noahic Covenant, God directed people to
be fruitful and multiply (Gen 9:17), and He instructed them concerning the food
they were to eat (Gen 9:3). The most basic human functions–eating and
procreation–are circumscribed by God’s commands, both according to God’s
original dealings with humanity in creation and according to the Noahic
Covenant.
Some parallels between the context of God’s work in
His original creation and in His dealings with Noah:
-The earth was formless and void: covered with water. Gen
1:2
|
-The earth was entirely covered with water. Gen 6:17-20
|
-God made light and darkness–naming the day and
night–then He made the sun, moon, and stars to govern the day and night, as
well as the seasons, days and years. Gen 1:3-5, 14-19
|
-God re-established seedtime and harvest, cold and heat,
summer and winter, day and night. Gen 8:22
|
-God directed people to be fruitful and multiply. Gen
1:28
|
-God directed people to be fruitful and multiply. Gen
9:17
|
-God instructed people concerning the food they were
allowed to eat. Gen 1:29
|
-God instructed people concerning the food they were
allowed to eat. Gen 9:3
|
The Gracious,
Unconditional Nature of the Noahic Covenant
Spirit-inspired
Scripture declares, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom
3:23). There would be one exception to this rule (Heb 4:15), but Noah was not
that exception. God’s choosing of Noah was an act of His grace (the word
translated “favor” may be translated “grace”).
God
had told Adam that he would face death for eating fruit from the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil on the day that he ate the fruit (Gen 2:17). Adam indeed experienced the condemnation
of death, the curse of suffering, and forsakenness from God from the very day
that he broke God’s command. But Adam did not immediately drop dead; he was not
immediately cast into Hell, which is what he deserved. Instead–even as God was
pronouncing curses on Adam, Eve, and the serpent–God also issued a promise. God
promised that a seed from the woman would–though having His heel bruised by the
serpent’s seed–nevertheless bruise the head of the serpent’s seed (Gen 3:15).
This seed, who would break the serpent’s head, had not yet been brought into the
world during Noah’s time. Therefore, the Covenant of Redemption–as it first
began to be revealed in God’s promise concerning the seed of the woman–came to
depend on God’s gracious, covenantal dealings with Noah. If Adam had
immediately been destroyed in the Garden of Eden, then he would have had no
hope of salvation; if all mankind had been destroyed in the flood, then God’s
eternal plan (the Covenant of Redemption) would have been frustrated, and His
promise concerning the seed of the woman would have been broken.
Seen
in this light, the Noahic Covenant was a means used by the Father, by which He
(re-)set the world-stage in order to fulfill His eternal decree concerning His
Son (the head of the Covenant Redemption and the promised seed). For this reason,
the Noahic Covenant–unlike some other covenants–did not include a curse that
would be given if people broke this covenant. The Noahic Covenant “was simply a
unilateral promise to save Noah and his family and never destroy the world by
water again. God Himself even supplied the ‘sign’ of the covenant (Gen 6:18-22;
9:8-17).
Man could do nothing to break the covenant so that God would destroy the world
by water again as a curse.”
As
a unilateral covenant given for the purpose of redemption, the Noahic Covenant
(which was given in connection with an acceptable sacrifice, Gen 8:20-21) was
similar to a later covenant: the New Covenant established in Christ. The
similarity between the Noahic Covenant and the New Covenant is not just
something that modern scholars may “read-in” to the text. Rather, the
Spirit-inspired Prophet, in a passage predicting the New Covenant, declared, “This is like the days of Noah to me: as I swore that the
waters of Noah should no more go over the earth, so I have sworn that I will
not be angry with you, and will not rebuke you” (Isa 54:9). The Noahic Covenant
set the stage for and pointed forward to the New Covenant: the Covenant of
Grace by which the blood of Christ removes God’s wrath toward elect sinners.
There
is a single Noahic Covenant. Though the “covenant” with Noah was first
mentioned in Genesis 6:18, the covenant was not ratified, along with the
covenant sign being given, until Genesis 8:22-9:17. God gave an initial
expression of a covenant commitment to Noah before the flood, followed by a
formal inauguration of the covenant after the flood. Robertson notes: “This
covenantal activity fits a frequent pattern of covenantal administration in
Scripture. It is not necessary to posit two covenants with Noah, one preceding
the flood and one following the flood” (Robertson, 110n2). Likewise,
Goldsworthy notes that God spoke of the covenant using the singular: though the
details were different each time God spoke of the covenant with Noah, and the
covenant is revealed in several places, we must think of it as one covenant.
Graeme Goldsworthy, According to Plan: The Unfolding Revelation of God in
the Bible (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity
Press, 1991), 114-115.
Labels: Bible study
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home